Authors: Hannah C. Becker; Luke J. Norman; Huan Yang; Christopher S. Monk; K. Luan Phan; Stephan F. Taylor; Yanni Liu; Kristin Mannella; Kate D. Fitzgerald · Research

How Do Brain Networks Differ in Young People with OCD Compared to Anxiety?

Study finds unique brain connectivity patterns in youth with OCD compared to those with anxiety disorders

Source: Becker, H. C., Norman, L. J., Yang, H., Monk, C. S., Phan, K. L., Taylor, S. F., Liu, Y., Mannella, K., & Fitzgerald, K. D. (2021). Disorder-specific cingulo-opercular network hyperconnectivity in pediatric OCD relative to pediatric anxiety. Psychological Medicine, 53, 1468-1478. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721003044

What you need to know

  • This study looked at brain connectivity patterns in young females with OCD, anxiety disorders, and no mental health conditions.
  • Youth with OCD showed increased connectivity within a brain network involved in detecting errors and selecting actions.
  • This increased connectivity was not seen in youth with anxiety disorders, suggesting it may be specific to OCD.
  • The findings could help distinguish OCD from anxiety disorders and lead to more targeted treatments.

Comparing Brain Networks in OCD and Anxiety

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and anxiety disorders share many similarities in their symptoms. Both can involve excessive worrying, fear, and repetitive behaviors aimed at reducing distress. However, they are considered distinct conditions. To better understand what makes OCD unique from anxiety disorders, researchers are studying differences in brain function between these conditions.

This study looked at connectivity patterns between different brain networks in young females with OCD, anxiety disorders, and no mental health conditions. The researchers were particularly interested in three key brain networks:

  1. The orbitofrontal-striatal-thalamic (OST) network, which is involved in habits and motivation
  2. The cingulo-opercular network (CON), which helps detect errors and select actions
  3. The default mode network (DMN), which is active when the mind is wandering or engaged in self-reflection

By examining how these networks communicate within themselves and with each other, the researchers hoped to identify connectivity patterns specific to OCD.

Studying Brain Connectivity

The study included 93 females between ages 8-21:

  • 23 with OCD
  • 26 with anxiety disorders
  • 44 healthy controls with no mental health conditions

Importantly, none of the participants were taking psychiatric medications at the time of the study. This helped ensure that any observed brain differences were not due to medication effects.

The researchers used a brain imaging technique called resting-state functional MRI to measure connectivity between different brain regions. Participants simply lay still in the MRI scanner while their brains were scanned. Even when we’re not actively doing a task, different brain regions show coordinated activity patterns. By measuring these patterns, researchers can see how strongly different areas are connected.

Key Findings

The study found two main differences in brain connectivity for the OCD group compared to both the anxiety and control groups:

  1. Increased connectivity within the cingulo-opercular network (CON)
  2. Increased connectivity between the CON and the orbitofrontal-striatal-thalamic (OST) network

Importantly, these connectivity differences were not seen in the anxiety group. The anxiety group did not show any significant differences in connectivity compared to the healthy control group for the brain networks examined.

What Do These Findings Mean?

The cingulo-opercular network (CON) plays an important role in detecting errors and selecting appropriate actions. In people with OCD, this network appears to be more strongly connected both within itself and to habit-related brain regions in the OST network.

This increased connectivity could potentially explain some key features of OCD:

  • Hyperactive error monitoring: People with OCD often have an excessive sense that something is “not right” or that they’ve made a mistake, even when everything is actually fine. The increased connectivity within the CON may reflect this heightened error detection system.

  • Difficulty stopping compulsions: The stronger connection between the CON and habit-related brain regions could make it harder for people with OCD to stop compulsive behaviors, even when they want to.

  • Cognitive inflexibility: People with OCD often have trouble shifting their attention away from obsessive thoughts or changing their behavior. The altered connectivity patterns may contribute to this mental rigidity.

Importantly, these connectivity differences appear to be specific to OCD and were not seen in people with anxiety disorders. This suggests there may be distinct brain mechanisms underlying OCD versus anxiety, even though the conditions share some similar symptoms.

Limitations and Future Directions

While these findings are intriguing, it’s important to note some limitations of the study:

  • The study only included young females, so the results may not apply to males or adults with OCD.
  • The anxiety group included people with different types of anxiety disorders, which could potentially mask some anxiety-specific brain patterns.
  • Brain connectivity patterns don’t necessarily translate directly to behavior. More research is needed to understand how these connectivity differences relate to specific OCD symptoms.

Future studies could:

  • Include male participants and a wider age range
  • Look at how brain connectivity changes as OCD symptoms improve with treatment
  • Examine additional brain networks beyond the three focused on in this study

Potential Implications

If replicated in larger studies, these findings could have several important implications:

  1. Improved diagnosis: Brain connectivity patterns might eventually help distinguish between OCD and anxiety disorders in cases where symptoms overlap.

  2. New treatment targets: Therapies that specifically target the cingulo-opercular network function might be developed for OCD.

  3. Predicting treatment response: Connectivity strength in these networks could potentially predict which treatments will work best for an individual with OCD.

  4. Earlier intervention: If these brain patterns emerge early in the course of OCD, they might help identify young people at risk and allow for earlier treatment.

Conclusions

  • Young females with OCD show increased connectivity within the cingulo-opercular network (CON) and between the CON and habit-related brain regions.
  • These connectivity patterns were not seen in young females with anxiety disorders, suggesting they may be specific to OCD.
  • The findings point to potential differences in error monitoring and action selection processes in OCD versus anxiety.
  • More research is needed to understand how these brain connectivity patterns relate to specific OCD symptoms and behaviors.

While this study provides exciting new insights into the brain basis of OCD, it’s important to remember that OCD is a complex disorder influenced by many factors beyond brain connectivity. These findings are just one piece of the puzzle in understanding and ultimately improving treatment for OCD.

Back to Blog

Related Articles

View All Articles »